The Environmental Lie for global domination
Disclaimer: This is not a conspiracy theory, this is based on years of evidence gathering by Jacob Nordangård.
Modern environmentalism is not the grass-roots response to ecological crisis that most people believe it is. It is a carefully manufactured system of narratives and institutions, built by elite foundations and global organizations, designed to consolidate power on a planetary scale. The environmental crisis story functions as the tool. The real project is control.
The Rockefeller System of Power
The Rockefeller family played the central role in this transformation. Their philanthropic model was never simply benevolent; it was a mechanism for shaping entire fields of science and governance. In medicine, their foundations standardized global health. In education, they steered universities toward centralized systems of knowledge. And in environmentalism, they financed the very architecture that turned local ecological concerns into a global mandate.
But it was all a lie.
The Rockefellers funded ecology programs, international research councils, and population studies from the mid-20th century onward. These were not neutral studies. They were designed to recast human beings and their environment as variables in a global management system. By controlling the science and the narrative, they could control the policy and society.
The Globalization of the Environmental Crisis
The decisive moment came in the late 1960s and early 1970s. In 1972, the Club of Rome published The Limits to Growth, a Rockefeller-linked project that used computer simulations to predict civilizational collapse without strict resource management. The same year, the Stockholm Conference produced the United Nations Environment Programme, embedding “the environment” into the UN’s permanent structure.
These were not spontaneous developments. They were deliberate steps in a coordinated strategy: use the language of planetary crisis to justify supranational governance. Once the “biosphere” was redefined as a fragile system at risk, sovereignty itself could be challenged.
The Role of Silent Spring
A crucial precursor to this shift was the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962. Often celebrated as the book that ignited the modern environmental movement, Nordangård shows that its success was no accident of public sentiment. The project was heavily supported by elite philanthropic networks, with the Rockefeller Foundation and allied institutions funding both Carson’s research and the networks that promoted the book globally. By transforming concern about pesticides into a cultural symbol of planetary fragility, Silent Spring prepared the ground for the broader agenda that followed. Its carefully orchestrated promotion demonstrated how scientific narratives could be weaponized to generate fear, reshape policy, and build popular support for top-down control.
From Population to Climate
Nordangård shows how the crisis narrative shifted over time, always toward greater centralization.
In the 1950s and 1960s, overpopulation was declared the existential threat. The Rockefeller-created Population Council drove governments to adopt aggressive demographic control policies.
In the 1970s, scarcity of resources and pollution became the rallying cry, feeding directly into energy control and industrial regulation.
By the 1980s and 1990s, the narrative crystallized around climate change. Carbon became the master key — a universal metric by which all human activity could be measured, monitored, and controlled.
Climate Change as a Governance Architecture
Carbon emissions were not just a scientific problem. They were the pretext for building an entirely new political order. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established in 1988, served as the institutional mouthpiece for “consensus science.” UN summits from Rio (1992) to Kyoto (1997) to Paris (2015) provided the legal and bureaucratic machinery.
Through climate policy, elites secured influence over energy, agriculture, finance, land use, and even personal consumption. Nordangård makes clear: this was never only about the weather. It was about constructing a system of planetary management, legitimized by fear of catastrophe.
Sustainability: The Language of Control
The Brundtland Report (1987) and Agenda 21 (1992) embedded “sustainable development” into global politics. Nordangård demonstrates that sustainability was not a neutral scientific principle, but a political slogan — one that allowed elites to expand authority into every corner of society. Education, infrastructure, business, and local government were all reframed under the banner of sustainability, aligning them with a central vision crafted by foundations, think tanks, and international bureaucracies.
Conclusion
The record is clear. Environmentalism in its modern form is not grassroots, not spontaneous, and not politically neutral. It is a manufactured lie, created by powerful elites to secure domination over nations and peoples. The Rockefeller family and their networks built the institutions, financed the research, and orchestrated the crises. From Silent Spring to climate change, every stage of the narrative was cultivated and promoted with elite funding.
For more information watch this presentation by Jacob Nordengard: